Breaking News/EventExpert OpinionSector Analysis

Jim Cramer's '10 Stocks To Own For The Future' In 2000 Cost This Redditor A Decade Of Retirement, Says Having To Work 10 More Years Was 'Painful'

BenzingaDecember 01, 2025 at 4:45 AMFull Content
View Original →

📊 Workflow Status

✓ CompletedCompleted in 226m 6s
clean_raw_article
✓ completed
clean_markdown_article
✓ completed
analyze_article
✓ completed
link_article_to_stories
⊘ skipped
analyze_sentiment
✓ completed
Workflow #46 • Benzinga Article Processing
Started: 11:00:00 • Completed: 14:46:07
View Details →

Detected Companies & Sentiment

SAP SE
"not mentioned"
0

Gist

A Reddit user claims Jim Cramer's 2000 stock recommendations cost him a decade of retirement due to the dot-com bubble burst, highlighting the risks of following celebrity financial advice.

LLM Summary

A Reddit user recounts how investing in Jim Cramer's '10 Stocks to Own for the Future' list in 2000—just before the dot-com crash—led to massive losses and forced him to work 10 extra years, illustrating the dangers of following high-profile stock picks during market bubbles. The post sparked discussion about Cramer’s legacy, the 'inverse Cramer' trend, and the creation of a related ETF that was later shut down. Cramer defended his track record, noting he welcomes critics and has been right on major tech stocks over time.

Full Article Content

A Reddit user slammed Jim Cramer’s stock picks at the peak of the Dot-Com bubble, saying that the CNBC host’s suggestions cost him a decade of retirement.

Cramer’s Suggestions ‘Were Destroyed’

On Saturday, in a post on Reddit’s “/r/Stocks” subreddit, a user who goes by the name “SpellAccomplished541” called out Cramer’s viral “10 stocks to own for the future” list in the year 2000, just weeks before the dot-com bubble burst.

According to the post, Cramer claimed that he was buying these stocks “every day, especially if they went down,” insisting that their “valuations were old-fashioned” and the picks were “guaranteed” to surge 10 to 20 times.

Cramer Was Bearish On Legacy Giants

These picks were given out by Cramer during the 6th Annual Internet and Electronic Commerce Conference and Exposition in February 2000, when he managed the hedge fund, Cramer Berkowitz & Co., before beginning his stint as the host of CNBC’s “Mad Money.”

Over time, calls like these helped fuel the running joke in finance and investing circles, known as “inverse Cramer,” which essentially refers to doing the opposite of whatever he recommends.

This has since prompted the creation of the Inverse Cramer ETF by Tuttle Capital Management, which allows investors to make bets against Cramer’s picks and suggestions. The fund has since been shut down.

Cramer, however, has defended his stock picks over the years, saying, “As always, I welcome people betting against me. I have done this for 42 years.”

He said, people betting against him “would have been betting against Apple at $5, Google since inception, Meta at $18, Amazon at $10, Nvidia at $25 and AMD at $5. I welcome all comers.”

As always i welcome people betting against me. I have done this for 42 years. Those who know me know that you would have been betting against Apple at 5, Google since inception, Meta at $18, Amazon at ten, Nvidia at $25 and AMD at $5. i welcome all comers..
— Jim Cramer (@jimcramer) October 7, 2022

Metadata

Author:
Vishaal Sanjay
Image URL:
https://cdn.benzinga.com/files/imagecache/250x187xUP/images/story/2025/11/30/Chinas-Exports-Surge-Despite-US-Shortfal.jpeg
Tickers:
HPQ, SAP, TLSNY, VRSN
Updated At:
December 01, 2025 at 12:45 AM
Benzinga Channels:
Equities, News, Markets, General
Benzinga Tags:
dot com bubble, Inverse Cramer, Reddit, Jim Cramer
Teaser:
A Reddit user slammed Jim Cramer's stock picks at the peak of the Dot-Com bubble, saying that the CNBC host's suggestions cost him a decade of retirement.
Benzinga Stocks:
HPQ (NYSE), SAP (NYSE), TLSNY (OTC), VRSN (NASDAQ)
Benzinga Article ID:
49128579